Fuse Paper Ignitor
I wish I could say I invented fuse paper, but no way, it's too clever for
me.
It was in one of the books in my high school library indended to prevent
the reproduction of geeks like me.
Yeah, I think that book was intended to take us out of the gene pool.
For instance, there was an article was on how to make a gas explosion using
alcohol, ether, or gasoline.
An illustration was provided, wherein a school kid is shown igniting one
of these set up in a large glass laboratory jar. Even at that naive
age I wondered if that were a good idea.
There were no captions like: "This is DUMB!"
or "look what we got this idiot to do..."
Even I was not stupid enough to try that - I stuck with metal cans, and was
lucky to escape with all my faculties intact. At least the kid was
wearing goggles.
But there was a jewel in this book, a throwaway line that I can almost quote:
"Soak paper toweling in a solution of potassium nitrate, let it dry,
and it will burn like a fuse, without flame."
I made lots of fuse paper. It did not substitute for rolled black powder
fuse. It would not burn through a tiny opening, or past any point at
which it was compressed. But it burned well in open air, and made large
amounts of smelly smoke.
While preparing a moon-burner load for static testing and pondering the non-straight
path the ignitor lead must follow into and out of the motor casing, I had
a throwaway thought: wrap a strip of fuse paper around a bare ignitor
bridge wire, and have it serve as the pyrogen. Could that work?
Tried one in open air... It worked! Made a little smoky flash.
Tried one inside a small grain. It worked! Bigger smokier flash.
Tried it in two 38mm static tests - both ignited OK, one fairly quick.
Here's how
Materials:
One two-ply paper towel, 11 inches square (121 square inches)
1 teaspoon potassium nitrate*
1 tablespoon hot water.
The potassium nitrate is dissolved in the hot water, the towel pressed into
the water, squeezed and kneaded until the solution is evenly distrubuted.
The wet towel is carefully unfolded, laid flat on a glass baking dish, and
placed in a warm oven to dry.
Alternatively, it could be allowed to air-dry or sun-dry, but should not
be hung up to dry. That would prompt the liquid to migrate to the lower
side of the towel, making that side richer in KNO3, the top side leaner.
(* 1 tsp KNO3 makes a "rich" fuse paper, which burns rather fast. If
you wish to use this for a delay train, try 1/4 tsp instead.)
To complete the ignitor, I cut a strip of fuse paper 1 inch wide and three
or four inches long, wrapped it around the head of a naked bridge wire, and tied it with sewing
thread. I have used yellow and purple thread so far, and haven't noticed
any difference.
That's it! So far, these have worked just fine in several static tests and two
launches. Reliability is good, and ignition speed seems comparable
to my "standard" ignitor, which is a bare match inside a piece of masking
tape with a pinch of homebrew black powder and either Ti or Mg flakes for
spice. The only failure was when I entered klutz mode and put the ignitor
in the wrong place. A subsequent conventional ignitor failed in the
same motor, same reason.
Metal flakes could easily be included in this ignitor as well, simply by wrapping
them inside the paper.
Here: I tested one with a modest pinch of fine Ti flakes. Night
shot for effect.
Here are videos of the two types:
Without Ti (941k .mpg)
Notice the hot globs of molten KNO3 dancing around on the pad.
Such globs burn nice holes in wood or other flammable substances.
With Ti
(1 meg .mpg)
I find that a little white-hot metal increases the reliability of my bp ignitors.
So far it has not been necessary in the fuse paper ignitors, but I
have been loading them and firing them right away, before the grains have
a chance to pick up moisture. So metal may be good insurance for motors
that are stored, since candy propellant tends to form a damp surface which
is kinda hard to ignite.
Similarly, I would be concerned about the fuse paper wicking up moisture
from a damp grain if it is stored there for any length of time. Then
again, one does not normally insert the ignitor until the last moment, right?
I am intrigued by the possibilities of this ignitor. It is so easy
that it seems there must be something wrong with it. No doubt I will
find out what that is in further testing.
Jimmy Yawn
3/29/05
rev. 4/11/05
Recrystallized Rocketry